|
News
Regulatory Links
Proposal Request
Community Involvement
Site Map
|
 |
Approximately five years ago, EPA
began an enforcement initiative against colleges and
universities beginning in New England (EPA Region 1). Fines for
multimedia inspections were in the middle six figures
($500,000-$600,000). The initiative moved south to New York and
New Jersey (EPA Region 2), which caused the Association of
Independent Colleges and Universities of Pennsylvania (AICUP) to
seek a way to avoid fines for its colleges. The solution was a
“peer environmental audit” program, approved by EPA, that
allowed each college to self-audit using personnel from peer
audit institutions trained on environmental regulations and
armed with auditing software. This program succeeded in
Pennsylvania (EPA Region 3) and New Jersey (AICUNJ) and is now
being implemented in the southeast (EPA Region 4) at 109
colleges and universities in the states of Alabama, Florida,
Georgia, North Carolina, and Tennessee. Having spoken to EPA
officials in Region 5 (Midwest) and Region 7 (Plains), it is
reasonable to assume that EPA college and university initiatives
are soon to start in those regions. Consequently, 34 colleges
and universities in Indiana and Michigan have also entered into
similar self audit agreements with EPA.
| Utilizing the EPA Compliance Incentive Initiative, HRP
Associates, Inc., with legal partner
Halloran & Sage LLP,
negotiates an Audit Agreement with private colleges and
universities, as well as public universities via the
Associations and Federations of the Independent College and
Universities within a respective state. The Audit Agreement is
an effective mechanism for resolving a broad range and number of
institution-wide violations discovered during environmental
audits pursued under EPA’s Audit Policy. |
 |
Specifically our team provides:
-
An “Amnesty
Agreement” with EPA
-
A three-day
Peer Auditor Environmental Training Program
-
Project
management
-
Supervision of
audit, disclosure of violations, and completion of a final
compliance report for EPA
-
Receipt of EPA
Notice of Decision (NOD) waiving all gravity-based penalties
Accomplishments of
the program to date:
-
Average
penalties waived per college $537,000
-
As a result
for every $1 spent, $7-$10 dollars saved in fines and
penalties
-
Increased
number of environmentally trained and aware faculty,
administration and facilities personnel
-
New culture of
environmental compliance on-campus created
-
Setting
foundation for continuous improvement through Environmental
Management Systems (EMS)
-
Favorable
publicity arising from EPA signing ceremony with Regional
Director, State officials and participating colleges
|
The peer-audit and the Audit Agreement approach blends
the best elements of a self-audit and a third-party
independent audit by enabling trained peers from
participating schools to audit each other’s campus under
the direction of an experienced professional auditor.
Each peer auditor brings inherent knowledge and
experience of the campus environment, yet, with the
compliance training that the program provides, the
auditors also provide third-party objectivity. Of equal
importance, each peer auditor learns from their
experience conducting audits on other campuses and
brings that knowledge and expertise back to their own
campus. Furthermore, the relationships built during this
audit |
 |
|
program
have opened up dialogue between the participating
schools regarding environmental initiatives and
compliance strategies. The peer-audit program fosters an
atmosphere of change and cultural sustainability
previously unseen on college campuses in such large
scale. |
Environmental Initiatives Developed on
Campus
As a result of participating in the peer
audit program, the colleges and universities have developed and
implemented several improvements to their campuses, which have
exceeded the context of environmental compliance including:
-
Modifications
of labs and lectures to include environmental compliance
discussions;
-
Implementation
of solid waste recycling programs at educational facilities
and residential halls, and even through community programs;
-
The use of
water conservation through installation of waterless
urinals;
-
The use of
campus “zip cars” to eliminate automobiles on campus;
-
The benefit of
paid public transportation for students, faculty and staff
to eliminate the number of automobiles on campus;
-
Integrating
the campus Facilities Department with the Physics faculty to
create an Energy Conservation study on campus with students;
-
The
investigation of using solar power to provide hot water to
residential life;
-
Organization
of campus sustainability committees;
-
Placement of
dedicated staff to serve as campus Environmental Health &
Safety Coordinators;
-
Development
and implementation of campus-wide Chemical Hygiene Plans;
-
Development
and implementation of campus-wide Waste Management Plans;
-
Development
and implementation of Environmental Management Systems;
-
Preparation of
environmental videos for new student orientation;
-
OSHA awareness
for regulatory compliance;
-
Investigation
of alternative fuel usage (bio-diesel);
-
Middle school
and high school outreach for environmental compliance
assistance;
-
Elimination of
the use of cafeteria trays to reduce the amount of food
waste and amount of wastewater generated during cleaning;
-
Chemical "swap
shops" on campus (between departments) to try to eliminate
obsolete/legacy chemicals and to prevent excess chemical
ordering;
-
Network/informational pages set up on school intranets for
tracking EH&S information, thus providing a network for
everyone involved on campus;
-
Elimination of
aerosol can use on campus;
-
Elimination of mercury (thermometers/barometers/thermostats)
campus-wide.
 |
 |
 |
|
Daily
lectures |
Typical
violation in Art Department: disposal of oil based paint
&
solvent cleaners to sink |
Software
exercise:
field instruction with tablet |
References
Participating States
& Colleges/Universities
Testimonials
|
|